If a member discharges a firearm and no one is hit, what is the appropriate response?

The correct response is to investigate through the chain of command. When a member discharges a firearm, regardless of whether anyone is hit, it is crucial for the incident to be thoroughly investigated. This ensures that all aspects of the situation are understood, including the circumstances surrounding the discharge, adherence to policy and protocols, and any potential implications for safety and accountability.

Investigating through the chain of command allows for a structured and formal approach to handling the incident. It ensures that the appropriate supervisory personnel can review the circumstances under which the firearm was discharged and determine if any further action is needed, such as additional training for the member or policy review. This investigative process is vital for maintaining public trust and ensuring departmental integrity while also providing support to the member involved.

In contrast, conducting a standard review may not be comprehensive enough to address the seriousness of a firearm discharge. Self-reporting the incident is important but should be part of a more extensive investigation, rather than a standalone response. Lastly, stating no action is needed undermines the significance of the incident and neglects the potential risks and necessary evaluations that come with the discharge of a firearm. It is important to treat every discharge with the seriousness it warrants to uphold the principles of accountability and transparency in law enforcement.